I just cant believe how anyone could fall for the propaganda that is the "explanation" for how 2 towers collapsed, and a 3rd building that wasnt even hit by a plane collapsed all within a few hours. Complete bullshit.
I dont mean to offend anyone, especially if youve lost a loved one, or a friend, but c'mon man!
To be candid, if all one looks at is material that supports such a belief, then that is all one will believe.
I've seen both sides of the debate and the conspiracy side is............sorry, out to lunch.
Controlled demolition they say? Do they really know or understand how building demolitions work? How would it be possible for buildings with daily populations of OVER 50,000 people EACH, not notice or question people planting explosives? A job that would have taken MONTHS.
That, to remind all, involves drilling into concrete pylons and planting and threading miles of wires. How does one do that in a building with people present at all times of the day and night--NONE of those who got out have seen ANY such work being done. Its been TEN years......has there EVER been someone who stepped forward and said they saw people on a ONGOING basis performing suspicious work to the support structure of the building.
Hasn't been a one, has there?
Forget the Hollywood BS here. If its going to happen in conjunction with an aircraft ramming the building........then how does one guarantee the charges remain usable after that fact? There's no "buts" or "if onlys" here. What happened was what appears to have happened: a jetliner struck the building, the structure was compromised by the collision and the fires, and the buildings pancake-collapsed in on themselves. The other collapses took place as a result of buildings being structurally damaged by the WTC collapse. Why on earth would anyone try to set up something so dangerous they want GUARANTEED to happen, and then introduce such a wild variable that can fly into the face of the agenda and defeat said guarantees ??
( did you know that pretty much all building demos are done with charges physically wired to a detonator? Radio -dets are unheard of because they are impossible to control, especially in a urban location. The amount of electromagnetic signal traffic in NYC is huge, and a stray radio signal can trigger the det. That would mean having a physical wire leading to the pre-set charges. But WAIT, then you have a jetliner smashing into the building, which would damage the det-circuit. Why the hell would you risk the set-up with something so uncontrollable? Why not just fly ANOTHER plane-or two or three more-- into the building and truly make it look like THAT was the cause? A building collapse would leave evidence of the explosives used. Why would someone supposedly so cagey and clever want to leave such stupid traces? If one uses explosive experts to plant the charges, said experts would obviously, clearly remind the masterminds that explosives ALWAYS leave tell-tale traces. Why do that, if you want it to look like the result of a plane crash??
The conspiracists have no answers for that.)
The other oft-missed point is "why"? To conduct a "false-flag" operation in such a manner gains who exactly..........what? The conspiracists have no answer for that, at least nothing sensible. New World order and such nonsense aside.....the gains are far outstripped by the losses. The "secret cabals" are largely a joke, because basic forensics say that every human interaction leaves some sort of trace or trail regardless of what kind of interaction it is. And the people......gosh, to pull something of this scale off, and to keep the traces covered that well requires an enormous number of conscience-less people all acting in precise collusion together. And the expanse of the collusion would necessitate people being in cahoots at ALL levels of society and across a very broad expanse of industry and service. If the world actually works THAT way, then why stage such a dumb kind of event on obviously such a small scale?? Why not arrange attacks on the west coast too? And why not in foreign countries--allies and bystanders? If the perps believe the public would accept attacks in two cities, why not scale up things and conspire to attack a couple more?
Uh-uh, that is not only absurd, it ludicrous. You'd have participants with guilty consciences coming forward, people spilling the "truth" with supporting evidence---and its not happened at all. Certainly in no compelling, irrefutable way that the conspiracists can defend. All they have fronted are assumptions, bad or faulty science and circular "logic".
Occam's razor applies here: the simplest explanation remains that a bunch of crazies boarded planes, commandeered them and flew them into buildings.
The "crime" of the US government was not in fomenting and fostering that act but instead of taking advantage of it after the fact.
And that is another rant and a half for some other day.........