JoeCanuck

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Red and white once again! We've restored the classic look of JoeCanuck.

Author Topic: Hasbro Answers our January 2010 Questions!  (Read 4118 times)

Stealth Viper

  • Administrator
  • Black Ice Wannabe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3387
    • View Profile
Hasbro Answers our January 2010 Questions!
« on: January 16, 2010, 10:23:27 AM »

The answers to the newest JoeCanuck / Hasbro Q & A are now available at this link here.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2010, 09:37:16 AM by THE Mikeā„¢ »
Logged
Quote from: \"Pete The Greek\"
My review of the Rat:

A little piece of crap.

Storm.Shadow

  • phpBB Dead Eye Mechanic
  • *****
  • Posts: 594
    • View Profile
Re: Hasbro Answers our January 2010 Questions!
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2010, 10:26:36 AM »

Sucks that we're not getting the battle stations but at least I now know that I should obtain them through other means.  Thanks for getting that question answered!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Jay

  • HATE Mechanic
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
  • Won a record for "longest time as Shatner's hair".
    • View Profile
Re: Hasbro Answers our January 2010 Questions!
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2010, 05:04:17 PM »

Well, this is pretty lame that we won't get the Battle Stations, since Wal-Mart had gotten all the other exclusives before that. :(
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Quote
You're far too young to be this bitter and angry at the world....

latinjoe22

  • Global Moderator
  • Mudslinger Wannabe
  • *****
  • Posts: 2854
    • View Profile
Re: Hasbro Answers our January 2010 Questions!
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2010, 12:51:28 AM »

I'm really sad that question #2 didn't get an answer I thought it deserved. Hasbro obviously knows but they just don't want to tell us...yet?

As for question #1, at least it was a clear answer we got.

Question #3, I don't know what to say, they could've at least developped the answer a bit more.

The questions were better than the answers in my opinion.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
2 + 2 = 22

Jay

  • HATE Mechanic
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
  • Won a record for "longest time as Shatner's hair".
    • View Profile
Re: Hasbro Answers our January 2010 Questions!
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2010, 01:43:56 AM »

For question 3, they'll probably unveil the stuff at Toy Fair next month.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Quote
You're far too young to be this bitter and angry at the world....

pdaat

  • phpBB Chacal Noir Wannabe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1547
    • View Profile
Re: Hasbro Answers our January 2010 Questions!
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2010, 07:16:27 AM »

What is sad is that question 3 was asked about a dozen times by other forums.  

Hopefully the CanJoeCon is not set the same time as Fan Expo, or we may not even see what they are planning for it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.

BHMike

  • Administrator
  • Pimp Daddy Destro
  • *****
  • Posts: 7616
    • View Profile
    • http://www.bountyhuntertoys.com
Re: Hasbro Answers our January 2010 Questions!
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2010, 08:02:06 AM »

Quote from: "pdaat"
What is sad is that question 3 was asked about a dozen times by other forums.  

Hopefully the CanJoeCon is not set the same time as Fan Expo, or we may not even see what they are planning for it.

It's not... News coming 'hopefully' soon.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

latinjoe22

  • Global Moderator
  • Mudslinger Wannabe
  • *****
  • Posts: 2854
    • View Profile
Re: Hasbro Answers our January 2010 Questions!
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2010, 04:25:27 PM »

Quote from: "Jay"
For question 3, they'll probably unveil the stuff at Toy Fair next month.

Agreed. But usually Hasbro is generous enough to give a few hints to the fans or spoil us a bit. In this case, they just stated the obvious...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
2 + 2 = 22